Skip to main content

Scam Text Messages — Traffic School Fines:

The court has received reports of individuals receiving text messages claiming they owe outstanding fines related to traffic school matters. If you have completed and paid for traffic school and received a certificate, you do not owe any additional fines. These messages appear to be fraudulent. Do not click any links or provide payment information. If you have questions about your case, please contact the court directly.

Tentative Rulings

Civil Tentative Rulings and Probate Examiner Recommendations are available below. All attempts possible are made to have the information on these pages updated by 3:00pm the day prior to hearing in order to allow for any needed continuances or travel if an appearance should be required.

Civil Tentative Rulings: The court does not issue tentative rulings on Writs of Attachment, Writs of Possession, Claims of Exemption, Claims of Right to Possession, Motions to Tax Costs After Trial, Motions for New Trial, or Motions to Continue Trial. Under California Rules of Court, rule 3.1308 and Local Rule 701, any party opposed to the tentative ruling must notify the court and other parties by 4:00 p.m. today of their intention to appear for oral argument. The court's notice must be made by facsimile (fax) to 559-733-6774; by email to research_attorney@tulare.courts.ca.gov; or by telephoning (559) 730-5010.

Probate Examiner Recommendations: For further information regarding a probate matter listed below you may contact the Probate Document Examiner at 559-730-5000 ext #1430.  The Probate Calendar Clerk may be reached at 559-730-5000 Option 4, then Option 6. Note: The court does not issue probate examiner recommendations on petitions for approval of compromise of claim.

Civil Tentative Rulings

The Tentative Rulings for Monday, August 10, 2026, are:

Re:                Moreno, Jose vs. Pena's Disposal, Inc.

Case No.:   VCU301267

Date:           August 10, 2026

Time:           8:30 A.M. 

Dept.          9-The Honorable Nathan D. Ide

Motion:     Continued Motion for Preliminary Approval of Clas Action and PAGA Settlement

Tentative Ruling: To grant the motion; to set the motion for final approval for March 15, 2027, 8:30 am, Department 9.

Attorneys’ Fees and Costs

Attorneys’ fees of 33.3% of the gross settlement fund of $400,000 or $133,333.33 and costs not to exceed $35,000 are sought by Plaintiff’s counsel.

Counsel has utilized the percentage of common fund methodology as well as provided adequate lodestar information to evaluate the reasonableness of the fee request.

Here, Counsel indicates that the firm has spent 189.8  hours at rates ranging from $950 to $450 per hour totaling a lodestar of $135,935.00, resulting in a negative multiplier of .98. (Supplemental Declaration of Khaled ¶3.)

Therefore, the fees requested are preliminarily approved

Counsel previously indicated presently incurred costs of $24,213.49 and the Court approves costs not to exceed $35,000. (Initial Declaration of Khaled ¶38.)

Accordingly, the motion to preliminarily approve the Class Action and PAGA settlement is granted. Plaintiff’s deductions from the gross settlement of $400,000 are preliminarily approved as follows:

Preliminarily Approved Attorney Fees (33.3%):

$133,333.33

Preliminarily Approved Attorney Costs (up to):

$35,000.00

Preliminarily Approved Enhancement Payment to Plaintiff :

$5,000.00

Preliminarily Approved Settlement Administrator Costs

$6,700.00

Preliminarily Approved Total PAGA Payment:

$40,000.00

Preliminarily Approved Net Settlement Amount

$179,966.67

Motion for final approval is set for March 15, 2027 8:30 am, Department 9.

If no one requests oral argument, under Code of Civil Procedure section 1019.5(a) and California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312(a), no further written order is necessary. The minute order adopting this tentative ruling will become the order of the court and service by the clerk will constitute notice of the order. Court reporters are usually not available for law and motion matters in the civil division. The parties and counsel must provide their own reporter if they want a transcript of the proceedings.

Re:                Valadez, Brenda et al vs. DLR Management Group, Inc.

Case No.:   VCU310362

Date:           August 10, 2026

Time:           8:30 A.M. 

Dept.          9-The Honorable Nathan D. Ide

Motion:     Plaintiff’s Motions to Enforce Court Orders re: Defendant Kamohai as to (1) Further Responses to Form Interrogatories (Set One); (2) Further Responses to Form Interrogatories (Set Two); (3) Further Responses to Request For Production of Documents (Set One) (4) Further Responses to Requests for Admissions (Set One)

Tentative Ruling: (1) through (4): To inquire as to the coordination of the deposition and other issues raised by these motions with respect to notice and service on Defendant Kamohai.

If no one requests oral argument, under Code of Civil Procedure section 1019.5(a) and California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312(a), no further written order is necessary. The minute order adopting this tentative ruling will become the order of the court and service by the clerk will constitute notice of the order. Court reporters are usually not available for law and motion matters in the civil division. The parties and counsel must provide their own reporter if they want a transcript of the proceedings.

Re:                Marroquin, Cesar vs. Edwards, Heather

Case No.:   VCL335931

Date:           August 10, 2026

Time:           8:30 A.M. 

Dept.           9-The Honorable Nathan D. Ide

Motion:      Defendant Edwards’ Motion to Quash

Tentative Ruling: To inquire as to service of this motion to quash; if not served, the Court denies the motion.

Facts and Analysis

On July 8, 2026, Defendant Heather Edwards filed this motion to quash the summons and complaint as to insufficient service under Code of Civil Procedure section 1162, improper service of the 30 day notice, lack of standing, failure to name indispensable parties, lack of personal jurisdiction.

There is no proof of service of this motion.

There is no opposition to the motion.

Therefore, the Court will inquire at the hearing as to whether the motion was served on Plaintiff’s counsel.

If the motion to quash was not served, the Court’s tentative ruling is to deny it, as California Rule of Court, rule 3.1237(a) requires notice under Code of Civil Procedure section 1167.4 of not less than three days.

If no one requests oral argument, under Code of Civil Procedure section 1019.5(a) and California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312(a), no further written order is necessary. The minute order adopting this tentative ruling will become the order of the court and service by the clerk will constitute notice of the order. Court reporters are usually not available for law and motion matters in the civil division. The parties and counsel must provide their own reporter if they want a transcript of the proceedings.

Probate Examiner Recommendations

Honorable Bret D. Hillman Presiding- Department 2

Examiner notes for probate matters calendared August 10, 2026, that allow for posting:

Status:  Recommended for Approval (RFA), Appearance Required or Recommended, Approval Conditional Upon, etc.

Case Number

Case Name

Type

Status

Comments

VPR054127

In the Matter of Price, Patricia Annette

Letters of Administration

Recommended for Approval

 Supplemental documents in order

VPR054187

In the Matter of Wommack, Gary M.

Letters of Administration

Recommended for Approval

Documents in order

VPR054186

In the Matter of Rosa, Tommy Earl

Determine Succession to Primary Residence

Appearance Required

Petition Attachment 14: not all persons designated in the will to receive any property are listed, surviving or deceased

VPR054183

In the Matter of Clarence H. Hill Revocable Trust

Petition to Confirm Trust Assets

Appearance Required

Proposed order to be submitted for review

VPR053418

In the Matter of Guzman, Altagracia

Final Distribution Hearing

Appearance Required

Petition: Notice to Franchise Tax Board not addressed, Prob C § 9202(c)

VPR052385

In the Matter of Gilpin, Lula

Final Distribution Hearing

Appearance Required

Documents in order

VPR052046

In the Matter of Gracie Mae Rocha Irrevocable Special Needs Trust

Petition Hearing

Appearance Required

Documents in order

VPR054095

In the Matter of Aguayo, Armando

Appoint Conservator

Appearance Required

  1. Questionnaire (PRO-006) not filed.
  2. Limited Powers requested under Probate Code § 2351.5 and 1830(b)—orders, powers and duties not specified in Attachment 1h; 1j.
  3. Notice of Hearing not served 15 days prior on proposed conservatee.

Honorable Russell Burke Presiding- Department 19

Examiner notes for probate matters:

                                         Probate calendar for August 6, 2026

Status:  Recommended for Approval (RFA), Appearance Required or Recommended, Approval Conditional Upon, etc.

PLEASE NOTE:  All attempts possible are made to have the information on this page entered by 3:00 p.m. the day prior to hearing in order to allow for any needed continuances or travel if an appearance should be required.  For further information regarding a probate matter listed below you may contact the Probate Document Examiner at (559) 730-5000 x 1302 or 1430.

Case Number

Case Name

Type

Status

Comments

PPR054082

In the Matter of Clawson, Richard

Determine Succession to Primary Residence

Appearance required

Objection filed

PPR054179

In the Matter of Lara, Paul Sr

Letters of Administration

Appearance Required

No Order lodged

South County Justice Center & County Civic Center- Visalia

         SCJC- Honorable Russell Burke Presiding

         Visalia- Honorable Bret D. Hillman; Honorable Nathan D. Ide; Honorable David C. Mathias

Examiner notes for probate GUARDIANSHIP matters calendared August 6, 2026 & August 10, 2026 that allow for posting:

PLEASE NOTE:  All attempts possible are made to have the information on this page entered by 3:00 p.m. the day prior to hearing in order to allow for any needed continuances or travel if an appearance should be required.  For further information regarding a probate matter listed below you may contact the Probate Document Examiner at (559) 730-5000 x 1302.

Hearing Date & Time

Department Number

Case Number

Case Name

Comments

8/6/26 8:30 AM

Department 19

 PPR054070

IMO  A.W.T.

Request for Dismissal has not been filed.

Numerous mandatory requirements have not been completed and mandatory forms have not been filed.

8/6/26 8:30 AM

Department  2

 VPR054059

IMO  A.F.

Notice of Hearing (GC-020) has not been filed indicating Petition for Appointment was served pursuant to Probate Code §1511, re notice to grandparents & parents

8/10/26 8:30 AM

Department   9

 VPR050929

IMO  A.M..

Status Conference

8/10/26 8:30 AM

Department  2

 VPR044873

IMO  J.A.E.

Accounting appears to be in order

8/10/26 8:30 AM

Department  1

 VPR050006

IMO  S.A.S.

Review hearing re visitation & termination

OSC hearing for FTA